E for Eva

E for Eva Disc 2

Eva takes on lots of guy in three hot scenes. MUST HAVE!

Password:
evalovescock

e.part1.rar
e.part2.rar
e.part3.rar
e.part4.rar
e.part5.rar
e.part6.rar
e.part7.rar
e.part8.rar

Eskimo Spring in New York

Well, it's practically May but you wouldn't know it up here . . . we had lovely weather last week but the cold snap is back. Thankfully, there's enough to do indoors in New York to distract ourselves from the apocalyptic doom that awaits our progeny because of the damage we've done to the environment. As my friend E. said once, our kids will ask, "Mommy, what was winter like?"



Film Forum's having a Jean-Luc Goddard explosion the next five weeks. These puppies are going to sell-out like hotcakes, but I'll be there with my Jean Seberg haircut and my ray-bans if you need me.



Sarah Manguso's gorgeous and gut-wrenching memoir, The Two Kinds of Decay, pubs at the end of May.

Check out my friend Ryan McIlvain's short story, "Keep it Bible," in the current issue of The Paris Review.



Supermodel Agyness Deyn napoleons the May issue of I-D magazine with six, count 'em, six covers. Not only does the issue include some gorgeous fashion photography (starring Ms. Deyn, of course) it also features interviews with her bf and her mama . . . and Aggy interviews Vivienne Westwood.



Madonna's new record, Hard Candy, drops just in time for her fiftieth birthday. Material Girl, indeed.

John Turturro stars in BAM's production of Samuel Beckett's Endgame.

And, last, but not least, my Malcolm X glasses should arrive from Urban Outfitters.



So snuggle up with a movie or book, ladies and gents.

Spring, we'll wait for you to call.

Roxy Jezel

Roxy Jezel - Glazed and confused

Roxy blows off four guys!

Password: glazed

Download:
Part 1
Part 2

Euro Angel Hardballs 6 scene

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

NEW PORN RULE! FAKE FACIALS

NEW PORN RULE!

NO MORE FAKE FACIALS!

This is not a facial! This is a woman getting a bucket of creamed ice milk thrown in her face. If I wanted to see movies with no production values, no hot women, no talent and with ridiculous gimmicks to sell themselves then I would watch something by Extreme Associates.

I will say though, this picture kind of turns me on.

NEW PORN RULE! FAKE DICKS

NEW PORN RULE!

NO MORE FAKE DICKS!

That's not a penis! If I wanted to see a bullshit, fake looking generic cock on my TV, then I would watch a John Strong scene! What's worse is watching the girls pretend it's actually a real cock. And if you're going to use fake dicks at least make them realistic. Somewhere in America a kitchen Table is missing one of it's legs.

Girdles and heels

I was surprised that my wife saw a pair of these type of heels and actually said she liked them, maybe her and my taste are starting to get closer. link

Real heel porn

I work in London and I walk past Aldo everyday, I have seen these shoes in the window for a while and they are the sexiest heels around at the moment. Why do pornstars and glamour girls always wear the same old generic strappy sandles, have they none of their own? Do the people styling these shoots have such limited imagination? These are true heel porn! buy them here

How the Mighty Have Fallen

Take the Money and Run (Your Legacy Into the Ground)


Bobby and Bubby

Walking into work this morning, a woman in a bright orange t-shirt handed me the new issue of b, the Baltimore Sun's free bright orange daily newspaper (and website: bthesite.com) targeting young adults that at 40 pages acts as a sort of Examiner Lite (which is already pretty light to begin with). It's all part of the Sun's effort to broaden its audience at a time of declining revenue and increased competition in the newspaper industry and a vain attempt to get the cell phone generation to turn off their PCs and read newsprint. Whatever. What caught my eye was a reprint of a syndicated column (like so many things in the Sun!) from the LA Times by Patrick Goldstein called "Pacino and DeNiro: How the Mighty Have Fallen."

It's a great piece, stating what we've all known for so long, namely that these once proud A-list actors continue to muddy their legacies by making crap movies for filthy lucre instead of being more selective like the Jack Nicolsons and Clint Eastwoods of the world.

PACINO AND DENIRO: HOW THE MIGHT HAVE FALLEN
The once-great actors are embarrassing, if enriching, themselves with film choices.
By Patrick Goldstein, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
April 21, 2008

I thought Francis Ford Coppola was being cranky last fall when he badmouthed Al Pacino and Robert De Niro -- the stars of Coppola's immortal "Godfather" films -- for taking parts for the money and losing their passion for doing great work. "I met both Pacino and De Niro when they were really on the come," Coppola told GQ magazine. "Now Pacino is very rich, maybe because he never spends any money; he just puts it in his mattress. . . . They all live off the fat of the land."

Coppola was right on the money. The two icons of '70s New Hollywood, heroes to a generation of young actors and filmmakers, have become parodies of themselves, making payday movies and turning in performances that are hollow echoes of the electrically charged work they did in such films as "Serpico," "Dog Day Afternoon," "Mean Streets" and "Taxi Driver."

Of the dozen or so movies that opened in Los Angeles on Friday, only one had a lead actor Oscar winner in the starring role -- and it was the worst in the bunch, which is really saying something, considering the competition included a scarefest called "Zombie Strippers" (with adult film star Jenna Jameson!) and a gruesome murder-mystery about a gang of psycho medical students called "Pathology."

"88 Minutes," a hapless thriller, stars Pacino as a hotshot forensic psychiatrist stalked by a mysterious killer. The critics have had a field day -- when I last looked, it was the lowest-rated movie of the year on Metacritic.com. While the critics pounced on Jon Avnet for his inept pacing -- despite its title, the film actually runs for a seemingly endless 107 minutes -- it's Pacino who got a real drubbing.

The New York Times' Manohla Dargis zeroed in on what might be Pacino's most glaring failing, his vanity, describing the actor as having "a dusky orange tan that suggests a charbroiled George Hamilton and an elevated poof of hair that appears to have been engineered to put Mr. Pacino within vertical range of his female costars." Throughout the film, Pacino, who turns 68 on Friday, is surrounded by nubile young actresses who play students lusting after or enamored by him. One of the film's bizarre moments occurs when Pacino and a comely student rush back to his apartment, where, in the midst of their desperate efforts to locate the killer, she takes off her blouse and tosses it on his stairs.

It's not as if this film were a rare misstep in an otherwise unblemished career. Pacino has made a string of bad films lately, including the famously awful "Gigli," "The Recruit" and "Two for the Money," where he hams it up as an unscrupulous football oddsmaker. If anyone has made more movies for the money than Pacino, it would be De Niro, who has largely abandoned serious dramatic work for a spate of forgettable horror and crime thrillers (try sitting through "Hide and Seek" or "Godsend") and lowbrow comedy high jinks like "Meet the Fockers" and "Analyze That."

De Niro's most recent film, "What Just Happened?," an inside-the-movie-biz comedy, got such an abysmal reception at Sundance that it limped out of the festival without a sale (it's expected to close the Cannes Film Festival this year). De Niro cut his longtime ties with CAA last week, defecting to Endeavor, inspiring a venomous response purportedly from one CAA agent that was e-mailed all over town. Claiming that De Niro asks for a $1-million production fee on his pictures to help fund his Tribeca empire in New York, it minces few words, saying, "Bobby held us responsible for his own greed, his own avarice and his own megalomania. And it's just like the studios now ask us: Why should we pay this guy -- who doesn't open a movie -- the payoff to his production company, just so he can add his name as a producer?"

The e-mail makes a subtler point about De Niro's career choices, pointing out that he could've "gone the [Jack] Nicholson route -- very selective, very particular, protect the brand -- or go out sending himself up in tripe like 'Analyze This,' which made money but turned him into that 'old psycho guy.' "

Not every aging actor in Hollywood has to embarrass himself. While Pacino and De Niro grab the dough, working for hacks and nonentities, Nicholson, with rare exception, has picked his spots, doing movies with Martin Scorsese, Alexander Payne and Sean Penn. Clint Eastwood, who's even older than Nicholson, has remained an iconic figure by working with the best director of all -- himself. (It's been almost 20 years since he acted in a movie he didn't direct.)

Other older actors, like Gene Hackman and Warren Beatty, have preferred to drop out of sight rather than embarrass themselves. After the debacle of "Town and Country," Beatty has devoted himself to raising his kids and giving interviews about “Bonnie and Clyde.” Michael Caine, who once chased paychecks himself, has turned himself into a respected character actor, doing such classy fare as "The Prestige," "Children of Men" and "The Quiet American."

It's not easy being an older actor in Hollywood, where the juiciest roles are written for a narrow age range that pretty much begins with Will Smith and ends with George Clooney. But if Pacino and De Niro are bedeviled by vanity, they are equally guilty of ego-stoked delusion. They still want to be treated like big-league stars, when they are, sadly, past their prime. Seeing Pacino in "88 Minutes" evoked memories of Willie Mays playing for the Mets at career's end, stumbling in the outfield he once glided across with effortless abandon.

Sadly, Pacino knew exactly what he was getting into making "88 Minutes." Despite the presence of 19 producers on the credit scroll, the real auteur of the film is Avi Lerner, the colorful Israeli producer who has made hundreds of B movies over the last 20 years, having recently stepped up in budget class -- thanks to an influx of money from German film investment funds -- from direct-to-video thrillers with Jean Claude Van Damme and Steven Seagal and horror fare like "Shark Attack" to star vehicles with Sly Stallone ("Rambo") and Bruce Willis ("16 Blocks").

Insiders familiar with the project say Lerner paid Pacino $9 million to do the picture, knowing Pacino's presence in a commercial thriller would allow Lerner to offset the cost of the film by selling it overseas. Lerner pocketed $6 million more by selling domestic distribution rights to Sony Pictures.

Pacino declined to talk to me about the film. But Lerner got on the phone Friday to defend the picture. "I like it -- it's exactly the movie I wanted it to be," he says. "The critics can say what they want. That's the great thing about America. Everyone gets to have their opinion. It hurts when people call and say the reviews were terrible. But I don't read reviews. I hardly read anything." (Lerner is famous for not reading scripts either, though he insists he read "88 Minutes.")

Lerner insists Pacino deserves every cent he paid him. "He's a great guy -- on time, professional, hard-working, always willing to do another take."

Lerner has another big bet down on Pacino, who returns this fall in "Righteous Kill," a serial killer thriller that teams Pacino with De Niro as New York City cops on the trail of an unsolved murder. With Avnet at the helm again, expectations for quality are low -- it has the get-out-your-checkbooks feel of the latest Eagles tour.

Lerner sees it differently. When I asked if the scathing reviews for "88 Minutes" could damage the film's commercial chances, he joked: "Hey, it's two different movies, two different sets of 17 producers." Turning serious, he said: "They are still two icons. If you get out of Beverly Hills, to Ventura Boulevard, every person you ask will say -- we want to see them together. Just like people did for Nicholson and Morgan Freeman in 'The Bucket List.' And they're even older!"

I don't envy Pacino or De Niro. They're in a bind, having come of age at a time when actors could still get provocative dramas made without everyone having to work for peanuts. Today they're grumpy old men, relegated to raking in loot from cartoonish comedy and generic thrillers.

It's no wonder De Niro's now in the hotel business. He and Pacino should take a tip from Woody Allen, who once joked that he made more money from selling his Manhattan apartment than from all his movies combined. Apartments come and go, but "Annie Hall" comes along only once in a lifetime.

Sad, but true.

Mitchell Leisen

TCM Airs 2 Screwball Comedy Classics

Can't wait to come home tonight and watch two of my fave screwball comedies by neglected director Mitchell Leisen (pictured left) on Turner Classic Movies. Easy Living (1937) kicks off the proceedings at 8 p.m., followed by Midnight (1939) at 9:45. Easy Living stars Jean Arthur and Ray Milland with a script by Preston Sturges, while Midnight pairs Claudette Colbert with Don Ameche (in his best role up until Cocoon) with a script by Billy Wilder - plus you get the great Monty Woolley (The Man Who Came To Dinner) playing a judge. If I didn't already have it on tape, I'd also stay up late for Billy Wilder's bizarre The Major and the Minor, in which Ray Milland falls for Ginger Rogers playing an underaged, pigtailed teenager. (We're talking jailbait here folks - played for comedy!)



The Mitch Is Back
Though I love these two films, Mitchell Leisen (1898-1972) has remained an unappreciated and otherwise forgetten auteur, with harsher critics calling the former set designer turned director a "swishy hack" who fashioned "a string of campy gossamer romances for the lesser Great Ladies of Tinsel Town" and Billy Wilder famously characterizing Leisen as a glorified "window dresser." It seems only David Melville, in his Senses of Cinema essay "Notes on an Exploding Star," gave the man his due when he stated, "Leisen's oeuvre was decades ahead of its time...He's a subtle and stylish auteur who could add heart and humanity to the brittle sophistication of Billy Wilder, lend grace and elegance to the boisterous Americana of Preston Sturges." In his Biographical Dictionary of Film, David Thomson echoes Melville's assessment but suggests that Leisen's romantic comedies flew under the radar of praise reserved for Wilder and Sturges because they were "too reliant on feeling to be screwball, too pleased with glamour to be satires – and thus less likely to attract critical attention.”

Check out these two films tonight and see what you think.

Easy Living (1937)
directed by Mitchell Leisen, 88 minutes, b&w

When millionaire Edward Arnold throws his wife's new fur coat out the window, it lands on office girl Jean Arthur, who gets a whole new life she never could have imagined. Believed to be the tycoon's mistress, Arthur gets free luxuries from storeowners and falls in love with Arnold's son, Ray Milland. Preston Sturges scripted this hilarious screwball romp.



Midnight (1939)
directed by Mitchell Leisen, 95 minutes, b&w

In order to keep a gigolo from his wife, Parisian aristocrat John Barrymore hires showgirl Claudette Colbert to impersonate a baroness and distract the would-be Romeo, in this fast-paced romantic farce scripted by Billy Wilder and Charles Brackett. With Don Ameche, Mary Astor, Monty Woolley.




Mitchell Leisen Links:
Wikipedia
Internet Movie Database
AllMovie.com
Senses of Cinema: Mitchell Leisen

© MURAKAMI

The award for most disappointing, revoltingly consumerist exhibit of the year goes to Takashi Murakami at the Brooklyn Museum for "© MURAKAMI."

Now, now, before you get your panties in a twist, let me explain myself. I know pop art is supposed to be consumerist. I know it's supposed to stroke the monolith of capitalism. I know Warhol, I know, I know, I know. But Murakami has taken it another step by designing handbags for Louis Vuitton and then SELLING THEM INSIDE THE EXHIBIT. I repeat: One can go to view ninety works by Murakami and then walk out of the exhibit with a handbag that costs about a grand.



You know I love fashion. I love Marc! And hey, I could maybe even love Murakami. But, and correct me if I'm wrong here, isn't the point of pop art to use elements of popular culture against themselves to make a comment about said pop culture? No? Yes? I thought so. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it doesn't matter anymore. But I'll tell you what the Murakami exhibit at the Brooklyn Museum is for. It's not about art, it's about making a buck.

As if the Louis Vuitton handbags weren't enough, the gift shop embedded at the end of the exhibit was enough to make me (and my poor mom who I subjected to this bullshit) hurl. My younger brother studies Japanese, and my mom and I thought he might like something from the gift shop. A shirt. A key-chain. A postcard. Something. Well, the postcards cost $2.75 EACH. A t-shirt on starched white cotton was FORTY TWO BUCKS, and one of these little plush toys (that every single Park Slope mother was purchasing in volumes from her droves of offspring) costs a clean FORTY-NINE SMACKERS.



What makes me the angriest about all this is the fact that this exhibit was SWARMED. Mom and I had to wait thirty minutes to get into the museum. The gift shop was cleaned out, and yes, I even saw a woman buy a purse. In the exhibit. I want to emphasize that the Vuitton shop (complete with shop boys in crisp white linens--at one point I said, "what the hell, does that white boy practice Santaria?" And my mom replied, "no, I think he works in the Louis Vuitton shop.") was inside the exhibit. Not at the end, or in another part of the museum, but IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ART EXHIBIT. Why?! So one can buy the fucking purse and then walk through the exhibit and look at the paintings and say, "hey! my purse kind of looks like that painting!" ?!?

Granted, I'm not a big fan of Murakami's work to begin with. I think it's repetitive, derivative, and stupid. There were highlights, like this piece:



Or this one:


But, really?


Thankfully, Judy Chicago's "The Dinner Party," is part of the Brooklyn Museum's permanent, fantastic wing of Feminist Art, so the visit was redeemed. But I couldn't get the taste of Murakami out of my mouth. I still can't. I think there's something very evil about all this. I'd like to hear a compelling argument about his work, if there is one.



Sorry, Murakami, but you're just not my bag!


*

If you want to vom, or you're way into the cultural implications of bullshit and derivative pop art, © MURAKAMI runs until July 13th, at the Brooklyn Museum.

Family Fodder

Savoir Fair: The Best of Family Fodder
(Dark Beloved Cloud Records, 1999)

Thanks go to my friend Deirtra for turning me on to this disc. I had never heard of this obscure UK band, which was a London-based musical collective centered around Alig Pearce (aka Alig Fodder) and his French girlfriend, singer Dominique Levillain, with members of post-punk ensemble This Heat involved as well. Apparently they existed in one form or another from the late '70s up through 1983, made one masterful album, Monkey Banana Kitchen, and were obsessed with Debbie Harry - releasing a single called "Debbie Harry" and covering Blondie's "Sunday Girl." They also covered Franz Schubert ("Die Leiermann") and Erik Satie ("The Big Dig"). Art school eccentrics. Go figure.

The collaborations with the multi-lingual chanteuse Levillain beg comparisons to Stereolab, but there's a lot more going on in their sound, as Pearce incorporates Dub, bass and drums, tape manipulation, and even unexpected humor - "Playing Golf With My Flesh Crawling" in particular is a hoot! - into the mix. One critic characterized the band's signature sound as "vocals emulating a driving piano/keyboard melody" with "thumping, 'four-on-the-floor' kick drum." Whatever, it's worth a listen.

Here are two video samples from YouTube.

FAMILY FODDER - "Debbie Harry"


A fan mash-up of the song set against a collage of iconic '80s chick rockers.

FAMILY FODDER - "Shame"


Related Links:

You can read more about Family Fodder at a wonderful website called The Greatest Band of All Time and read a detailed discography at the "lucidly hoptimistic fanzine" Letslivhappy! (while we await our death).

And you can read more about the Savoire Faire comp. at Fakejazz.com.

Alig Fodder on MySpace
Family Fodder on MySpace.

NEW PORN RULE! KHAN TUSION

NEW PORN RULE

KHAN TUSION MUST STOP BEING A PUSSY AND SHOW HIS FACE!

If you're man enough to slap a womans pussy and make her cry. Then you can be a man and show your face. No one is going to hunt you down and kill you, no one is going to show up at your studio and kick your ass for pissing on their sister. Because secretly we all love what you do (used to do, anyway) and we know that if you were dead we would be deprived of the chance that piss mops is coming back. If Max Hardcore can put on a Cowboy hat while his dick is in a girls ass and play the guitar... then you can show your face.

Plastics

Mr. McGuire: "I just want to say one word to you -just one word."
Ben: "Yes sir."
Mr. McGuire: "Are you listening?"
Ben: "Yes I am."
Mr. McGuire: "Plastics."
- Neil Simon, The Graduate

I love these guys - and gal! Japanese techno-pop from the '80s.



The Plastics:
Chica Sato--vocal
Toshio Nakanishi--vocal, guitar & percussion
Hajime Tachibana--guitar & vocal
Masahide Sakuma--keyboards, guitar & bass programming
Takemi Shima--rhythm box

Plastics website

PLASTICS ON SCTV - "TOP SECRET MAN"


PLASTICS LIVE - "TOP SECRET MAN"


PLASTICS - "COPY"

Elle Williams

This hard faced, small titted brunette is a fave of mine, she's done a few sets that I've just had to download. This one sees here in quite low heels but teamed with a great pair of black fully fashioned nylons and black girdle. link

NEW PORN RULE! BOOB JOBS

NEW PORN RULE!

PORN STARS MUST STOP RUINING THEIR BODIES BY GETTING RIDICULOUS IMPLANTS!

Very rarely does this ever work. Hillary Scott, Codi Lane, Lexus Locklear, Rio Mariah, Holly Wellin are all good examples of Porn Stars that looked better after a boob job. But the list of Porn Stars that look odd and freakish after their boob jobs is longer then my dick!

Melissa Lauren, Katsumi, Tegan Presley, Lucy Lee and a whole host of others. For all of these women there was that one day when I popped in a dvd and saw them with more alterations to their bodies then fucking Robocop . With all due respect, no one watches a Melissa Lauren scene to warship her body. I mean she is good looking. But we all watch Melissa Lauren to see her get fucked in the ass until she cries. Maybe on the business side it help her get a contract. But from the fan point of view it only hurts. I'll go on record and say right now that if Jasmine Byrne, Roxy Jezel, Jayna Oso, Chiquita Lopez, Bobbi Star, Taylor Rain, or Courtney Simpson ever get implants, I'm gonna jump out a fucking window and never watch one of their scenes again.! To be honest a really good boob job costs thousands of dollars ala. Christina Aguilerra or Mariah Carey. And most of the boob jobs we see in porn did not cost thousands of dollars.

NEW PORN RULE! TONY T

NEW PORN RULE!

TONY T MUST NEVER DO FOREPLAY IN HIS SCENES!

Tony T is one the most intense stunt cocks in the business. I don't think I have ever seen anyone get pumped harder then when tony t fucked the daylights out of Chloe Dior in "Big Wet Asses". He truly has a talent. But watching Tony T do foreplay comes off so dis-genuine and creepy I want to eject the DVD and lock it in a trunk for 80 years .

Watching Tony eat Jasmine Byrne's pussy, or suck Italia Christies tits, or put his middle finger in her butthole and make her taste it is like watching your Grandmother lick her lips. It's just not right.....

Please just do what you do best. Leave the loving for Michael Stefano.

NEW PORN RULE! BELLADONNA

NEW PORN RULE

BELLADONNA MUST STOP SCARING THE SHIT OUT OF ME WITH TERRIFYING DVD COVERS.

When I sit down to pleasure myself to a porno I want to be aroused, not have the fucking cum scared out of me! Who fucking directs her films for Christs sakes? Wes Craven!

Oxfords

This looks like a pretty old set but what was fetish a few years ago becomes the mainstream now. Woman wearing a pair of patent black, tie up oxford slingbacks... link

Donna

I don't know why I love this woman, maybe I think she could teach me things, maybe it's the open smiley face, maybe it's just those odd heels, but I just really like this one. a few links to her.
link
link
link

Alexandra - Only Opaques

A really cute set from Only Tease's stablemate Only Opaques. A non nude set featuring Alexandra in a grey rollneck dress, blue tights and cute grey suede heels. link

Footsucker

Everyone that has a thing for heels should read this book, a great novel by Geoff Nicholson of a man obsessed with shoes who meets his dream woman. Get it from amazon

Spikes

These are real "hum dingers" proper metal spikes, as modeled but the slightly more mature lady (fetishwife). I'm not really one for all the rubber, but you can't win 'em all. link

Sonja Kraus

Only a single shot of Sonja Kraus, a German ex-ballet dancer and model turned TV presenter. link

NEW PORN RULE! CARMEN KINSLEY

NEW PORN RULE!

CARMEN KINSLEY MUST LEARN TO DANCE!

Carmen Kinsley, you are so hot. Carmen Kinsley you are so fucking. Carmen Kinsley your tits, face, and ass make me wanna howl to the moon like a Wolf. And the day you finally do anal will be more important to me then my wedding day! But with all due respect watching you shake that 40 incher is like watching Karl Rove dance at the Correspondents dinner...it's just not right.

Please go to a Latin dance class and learn to move your body in a manner that doesn't make me think your parents are confederates.

NEW PORN RULE! BLACK MALE PERFORMERS

NEW PORN RULE!

ALL BLACK MALE TALENT MUST STOP THINKING THEY ARE RAPPERS AND GIVE IT A FUCKING BREAK ON THE BALL CAPS, JORDANS, CHAINS, RINGS, AND FRIGHTENING LOOKING GRILLS!

You're not rappers! You have no musical talents (I think Jake Steed proved that). You're in this position right now because you have a large cock, can maintain a hard-on for a long period of time and can come on cue, or your friend that has a large cock, can maintain a hard-on for a long period of time and can come on cue asked you if you wanted to be in a porn and fuck some "beyotches". That's all. When a guy watches a porn he is putting himself in the position of the guy who's fucking and I'll tell you, there is nothing more wood killing then watching an interracial flick with some black dude trying to be hardcore in a baby blue valor track suit covered in chains and rings. Then when it's time to fuck he won't take off his Air Force Ones.

But I guess this fits seeing as how most Rappers want to be pornstars.

NEW PORN RULE! MARK DAVIS

NEW PORN RULE!

MARK DAVIS MUST STOP THINKING THAT BILLIONS OF PEOPLE WORLD WIDE BUY PORN TO SEE HIM AND HIS CROOKED COCK!

Never before in porn has there been a more conceited performer. His British sneer exudes arrogance. I seriously think he thinks he's god. For now on all his scenes should just feature him alone with no girl... he can sit in a chair and wrap himself in saran wrap and put a flesh light on his dick and twist it like he makes all the girls twist on his dick and he can just sit there for 40 minutes and talk to the camera and slap the cameras chest. I bet he would think it would be just as compelling.

NEW PORN RULE! WESELY PIPES

NEW PORN RULE!

Wesley Pipes must wear a muzzle during all his scenes for now on.

Please! Wesley Pipes SHUT THE FUCK UP!!!!!!!!

Remember that guy from Goodfellas that always said the same thing twice? well I would bet my house that Mr. Pipes here loves the movie Goodfellas. He needs to shut the fuck up and concentrate on keeping his hard on.

NEW PORN RULE! NO MORE RACIST PORN STARS!

NEW PORN RULE!

NO MORE PORN STARS ARE ALLOWED TO BE RACIST!

If you walked up to your boss and told them that you "don't wanna be work'n wit dem colad folk no mo" what do you think would happen to you? You would be branded a racist and you would probably lose your job! But in the porn business not only is racism tolerated... in some cases it's encouraged.

Taylor Rain, Harmony Rose, Jessica Darlin, Christina Alexis. Please move back to "Alabamer" and take your ladders with you so you can get the fuck over yourselves. It's always funny hearing a porn star say she won't fuck a black guy right before she sticks her tongue up a white guys ass!

But then again, who am I to question the rational of women that drink piss, eat cum, lick asses and show their gaped and beat up pussies for the whole fucking world see right there on film.

Porn whores I just mentioned.... I ask you.
If a black man pisses in your mouth... is it not yellow?
If a black man asshole is licked... does it not taste like shit?

Don't be dividers.... Be uniter's

UPDATE: 1/9/11

After receiving a ton of responses to this post I need to clarify something. I'm black and my girlfriend is white and I don't normally date black women. But I would never rule it out. I believe that discriminating against someone based on their race is simply put racist. People seem to have this odd idea that when it comes to dating and attraction it's all due to fate and matters of the heart and you can't control what you like and you can't just help that you're not attracted to every single black in the world and that's bullshit! It's racism pure and simple. Now in this post I have chosen to single out white women not fucking black guys because in north American porn the predominant races are white men and women and black men and then to a lesser extent black women. One of the things I have been accused of on here is people assuming that because I'm black I have no problem with black women refusing to sleep with white men... that's not true. Let's be clear. When you work in porn.. that's your job. You may be asked to lick a toilet or get fucked in the ass or to let that guy choke you and sometimes you may be asked to fuck a black man. Now as a human being you have all the right to do whatever you want and or to not to. But if you're refusing to fuck a black guy because he's black.... that's racist. And you know what? The same applies for my fellow African American women that refuse to fuck "white devils" because they're grandma wouldn't approve. Racism goes all ways I'm not stupid. But let's be honest here.... It's generally one group of people in porn (white women) refusing to get it on with another (black men). Which I add a million times is their right, however let's call it what it is... racist.

What I was trying to point out in my original post is that it's funny how Taylor Rain for example a women who drank piss and ate cum for several years in porn apparently thought fucking a black man was hitting the bottom of the barrel.

I do understand how that sort of thug, gangsta bullshit can be a major turn off to women in general of any color and if you look at black male porn stars who have crossed over such as Sean Micheals, Lexington Steele, Franco Rocforte they don't really push that culture in their porn. I also see alot of black guys in porn that honestly look like if they weren't in porn they would be on the corner slanging rock. So I understand if some white women may have a problem participating in "black on white crime gangbang edition #4" where you have no clue where 7 of the ten guys came from.

The bottom line is, I know racism goes both ways and I know there are a lot of white men out there who don't like the idea of "niggers" fucking their precious white gold. Hence a lot of the misinformed messages I keep getting regarding this reply.

Hope this clears some things up.

NEW PORN RULE! KHAN TUSION

NEW PORN RULE!

Khan Tusion Must stop being a pussy and bring back Piss Mops and Meatholes!

In their absence Meatmembers.com has been reduced to utter shit. If you're afraid of going to prison, then release your shit euro style like Max does. Anal lick fest and Black crack addicts pale compared to your former days of prominence. It's time to get back to the good old days. You have to wonder why someone wouldn't capitalize on the niche of watching American pretty American white whores drink piss for a couple hundred bucks.

Fuck alternative energy... this is where the money is....

NEW PORN RULE! GIANNA MICHAELS

NEW PORN RULE! GIANNA MICHAELS MUST DO ANAL NOW! I know what's going to happen. She's going to wait fucking forever and then by the time she does it no one is going to care or the scene is going to suck 'ala April Flowers, Cytheria, Sativa Rose, and Lexus Locklear. I'm not saying she should become Audrey Hollander. But take Amy Reid for example. HER tits are just as fantastic as Giannas and her work has an intensity that you never see in a Gianna scene because she (Gianna) like most of the Brazzers girls don't do anal. Do anal now!

NEW PORN RULE! STILETTOS

NEW PORN RULE!

No more wearing stupid clownish Stilettos! These are an absolute "must go" in porn.... They are ugly and stupid looking. There is nothing more unattractive then watching some smoking broad get nailed and she's wearing these silly circus style 9 inch stilettos that are flapping back and forth as she's getting fucked. I would love to see Shyla Styles come out in her next scene wearing some big ass red clown shoes, because, it's basically the same thing as wearing retarded looking Stilettos! Would all American porn girls follow the Euros lead... Sexy thin heels are hot! But 9 inch retarded clown stilettos are not!

Clown shoes, male clogs, or even those stupid little Elfin shoes they wore in the Lord of the Rings. It doesn't matter what she wears because they are all just as ugly as these retarded looking stilettos. Or replace her feet entirely... it could be the new fetish girls with hoofs. I could see it now. "HOOF FUCKERS VOL. 9" brought to you by Extreme Associates.